Editor's Notes |
jules-rothstein@mediaone.net
| Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the full text and any section headings. |
Journals remain the primary source of biomedical information and, I believe, they will continue to play that role for the foreseeable future. Our Journal has a 2-fold challenge:
Data from readership and membership surveys indicate that now, far more than ever before, Association members are using the scientific literature published in the Journal to guide their patient management. This should be not only a source of pride for our profession, but an indication of how far we have come in developing a scientific basis for practice.
Nonetheless, many of our leaders and many of our leading researchers share the frustration that too much of practice is still based on anecdotes, authority, and other dubious sources of justification. I share this concern because,
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?